Craft
Elizabeth Rosner's Beloved Obligation
When the Holocaust is Family History
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96fdf/96fdf20ad02ac5194ee040f311bb0301e2d63905" alt="Elizabeth Rosner"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8923/f89235b34fa08c8c1d0e48f9986362419c639f3f" alt=""
Birthright
from Elizabeth Rosner’s Gravity (Atelier26 Books, 2014)
there are no
portraits
of ancestors
hanging on
my walls
no heirlooms
in velvet-lined
boxes
my legacy
is in my bones
in the grief I
wear beneath
my skin
a secret that
never goes away
but is passed
through the
coded messages
of blood
and that other
substance we
have no name for
Propeller: I am curious about how you feel about literature of the Holocaust? Does it present a different set of problems than other kinds of writing for you in particular, or for others?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1656e/1656ecf62e4138350bdd4991580d7d8e11a30f90" alt="Gravity by Elizabeth Rosner"
Recently I had the opportunity to interview Martin Amis in person, on the subject of his latest novel, The Zone of Interest. It's a brilliant and highly sophisticated piece of work; I respect his approach and its set of "distortions" as necessary to depict the surreality of Auschwitz. But some part of me also experiences a deep discomfort about the "imagination" involved. I get nervous about the (all-too-imminent) time when there will no longer be first-person witnesses, and we will all be reliant on interpretation. Like the rest of the world, I will have to make my peace with this inevitability. My family's personal history will become part of collective memory.
Propeller: I'm curious about your term "beloved obligation." It sounds like you are saying that for you, this interpretation and exploration of family history is essential to your creative project. Can you imagine a time when you might feel "done" with this subject, or do you ever wish you were? I can at times feel burdened by my own obsessions as a writer, and I'm curious if you ever experience ambivalence around this "obligation." Additionally, does poetry allow you to access different means of engagement than prose, and if so, how is it different?
Rosner: After completing The Speed of Light (which took me a total of ten years), I was sure I was "done" with the subject. And yet, my second novel, Blue Nude, insisted upon addressing the subject yet further. With that novel, my gaze turned toward the German side of this inheritance, and my discovered empathy for the challenges of carrying burdens of grief, shame and confusion... I found that my own creative process was a way of reconciling seemingly irreconcilable differences. After completing that book (which took a "mere" six years to write), I was really done.... Which was indeed a kind of relief and liberation for me. I wanted at that point to widen my scope, my canvas, my field of vision. And I could only write Electric City (eight years, while we're counting) after having written my way through the previous two novels.
Although I believe that my poetry and prose have much in common, I can say without a doubt that I learned a great deal about emotional honesty by way of writing poems. This was indirectly a result of surrendering my ambitions (about fame and fortune!) and letting the poems simply "tell the truth" in the clearest and most economical and (perhaps) most elegant way possible. Once I began doing that, I think my prose deepened a great deal too—that is, I have felt more able to take risks and get at more essential layers of the subjects and concerns that interest me.
Ambivalence to be sure. But probably more gratitude, strange as that may sound.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22a1f/22a1f2417ebd57d6a5729c0c3463853d7123ffed" alt=""